Monaco podium drama deepens as Martin Brundle questions FIA decision

Photo: Alpine F1 Team

17. 06. 2026 21:41 CET
icon timer
2 min

Monaco podium drama deepens as Martin Brundle questions FIA decision


Formula 1 2026 F1 season Alpine F1 Team F1 F1 Monaco Pierre Gasly

Martin Brundle has described the decision to restore Pierre Gasly’s Monaco Grand Prix podium as controversial, warning it could have wider consequences for Formula 1.

F1 & MotoGP news to your inbox every day.

Former Formula 1 driver Martin Brundle has described the decision to restore Pierre Gasly’s Monaco Grand Prix podium as a difficult and controversial situation. Gasly originally finished third in the race, but he was later dropped to seventh place after receiving a penalty for speeding in the pit lane. However, Alpine successfully used its right to review the decision, which resulted in Gasly being given back his third-place finish.

Brundle was highly critical of the situation in his Sky Sports F1 column. He described the ruling as “a very complicated and uncomfortable decision.” He explained that other drivers had already served their penalties during the race and adjusted their strategies accordingly, making the later change to the results controversial.

The decision also had a significant impact on other competitors. Isack Hadjar lost what would have been only the second podium finish of his Formula 1 career, while several teams believe they were unfairly affected by the review. Brundle noted that Mercedes, McLaren and Red Bull are expected to challenge the ruling because they lost points as a result. He also warned that the case “sets a precedent of not serving marginal in-race penalties to preserve the right to contest them post-race.”

The controversy began after several drivers were reported for speeding in the Monaco pit lane. Brundle explained that the FIA measures pit lane speed using timing loops rather than the speed displayed on the car’s dashboard. According to him, “one of the timing loops in the Monaco pit lane was 77cm shorter than calibrated, hence lots of 60.1kph recordings when the limit was 60kph.”

Brundle believes there were clear signs that something was wrong because several drivers received almost identical penalties. “There was clearly something amiss with so many identical offences,” he wrote, adding that it was surprising “that the stewards hadn’t been made aware” of the issue sooner.

Although he expects Formula 1 and the FIA to learn from the incident, Brundle admitted that the controversy has no straightforward answer. Summing up the situation, he concluded: “It’s all a mess with no easy solution.”

logo-newsgp logo-instagram logo-linkedin logo-whatsapp

To the topic

F1 & MotoGP news to your inbox every day.

logo-newsgp
Information

icon F1 and MotoGPF1 and MotoGP news

icon articlesNew articles every day

icon worldNews from around the world

icon reportsReports from races

logo-newsgp logo-instagram logo-linkedin logo-x logo-whatsapp logo-youtube

F1 & MotoGP news around the globe

Contact

NewsGP s.r.o.
Nové Sady 988/2
602 00, Brno, Czechia
IČO 22343776
European Union

info@news.gp


We have established partnerships with circuits, organizers, and official partners. As we do not collaborate directly with the owner of the Formula 1 licensing, it is necessary for us to include the following statement:

This website is unofficial and is not associated in any way with the Formula 1 companies. F1, FORMULA ONE, FORMULA 1, FIA FORMULA ONE WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP, GRAND PRIX and related marks are trade marks of Formula One Licensing B.V.

F1 & MotoGP news to your inbox every day.

F1 & MotoGP news to your inbox every day.